Text Box: Friday, April 5, 2002
The City's top value gives SF Exchange the edge



 

 


By Mark Silverman /San Francisco Examiner

There is Coke and there is Pepsi, but some people  just love RC Cola. Or C&C. Or even Shasta. Go figure. In any industry, no matter how big the big boys are, there is always an opportunity for a smaller, more agile niche player. Such is the case in timeshare. RCI and Interval International are unquestionably the behemoths of the industry, with more than 98% of timeshare owners belonging to one or the other. Most think of them as exchange companies, allowing somebody owning a condo in Orlando to trade for a ski chalet in Vermont; in reality they are much more.

In many cases, they provide “backbone” services to individual developers, managing their individual inventory and owner maintenance. This can include software for managing maintenance fees, procurement and a variety of other issues involved with efficient resort management to enhance the owner’s vacation experience.

There are other exchanges out there. Many of these “mom & pops” are only posing as exchanges, when there main purpose is to resell timeshare, or rent individual weeks. But there are success stories.

The San Francisco Exchange Company (SFX) is one such story. Ten years ago company founder Mel Grant had an idea for a different kind of exchange company “with true snob appeal, available only to the top 2% of resort-owners”.

Mel would design a network with one guiding philosophy, “If you were exchanging out of a top resort there was no reason to trade into anything less”.

The British born San Francisco transplant quickly realized that 2% would not offer a “critical mass of owners for him to make that work” so he quickly refined the concept. His adopted hometown, San Francisco, he saw was a prime place for timeshare; meeting the two most important qualifications “very high demand – very low supply”. He figured controlling the limited inventory of San Francisco exchange weeks would provide leverage to get virtually anything for his membership.

Grant went about contacting the 5,000 owners of San Francisco-based timeshare weeks. Both exchange companies rank San Francisco as a high demand “red week” 52 weeks of the year. He never suggests that anyone not be affiliated with one of the major exchange companies, but suggested that SFX would be a good addition to their RCI or Interval membership.

He even suggests that folks considering a purchase, whether their first weeks, or additional time, vet the properties through his company. If they meet the SFX standards, they are likely to provide strong exchange leverage regardless of the exchange company.

SFX, in fact, needs the biggies. Grants lean and mean organization does not have the resources to individually inspect the thousands of resorts out there. They depend on the Interval and RCI rankings, working only with those that have achieved either Gold Crown or Resort of International Distinction ranking; or Interval’s Five Star rating. In fact, what many consider a shortcoming – there is not even an SFX Resort Directory. Mel defends this by claiming it would be redundant and costly to print a book when all of his members already have at least one or the other exchange books.

SFX is widely considered to be the number three-exchange company. In fact, Hilton Grand Vacation club lists it as one of its resources. Hilton manages all exchanges for its membership, according to spokesperson Elena Norman; they probe the inventory of RCI, SFX and others in order to find the best possible match for the owner’s request.

Illinois based Shell group, with three resorts located in San Francisco, also has a formal affiliation with the upstart exchange company, in order to address client needs. Grant’s company benefits by not having formal arrangements with many resort developers. It protects him from “having to take the fleas with the dog”, only accepting prime weeks at top resorts.

A unique service Grant is able to offer his clientele is “proactive procurement”. Exploiting relationships with developers, other exchanges and management companies, SFX’s staff goes into the marketplace, bartering the valuable San Francisco weeks in his inventory to meet client requests. Paraphrasing George Orwell, “In a world where all red weeks are created equal, some are more equal than others.”

Ten years after creating this “bumble bee that could not possibly fly”, SFX lists more than 21,000 active members, and has grown far beyond its San Francisco roots. Almost nine thousand have upgraded from the free Gold status, to the $59/year Platinum membership. The premium membership allows for search without deposit, ability to reserve bonus weeks as much as a year in advance, and eligibility to exchange timeshare for space in select wine country bed and breakfasts. Gold members pay an exchange fee of $125, international or domestic, Platinum members pay $99.

Grant is optimistic about the growth potential for SFX. An understanding of technology and the market has his company where it is today. “Time is a perishable commodity”. His new venture, Bonusweeks.com provide an outlet for developers and owners associations to sell unused weeks at their resorts. “Because time is a perishable commodity” the program has a built-in mathematical algorithm built in that automatically lowers the price of unused weeks as the date approaches. Mel likens this to a reverse auction. 

The timeshare industry continues to evolve; Mel Grant is confidant that SFX will evolve with it.